Dr. Victoria Groves Scott, Ed.D.
Assistant Provost for Academic Innovation and Effectiveness and Professor of Special Education, Southern Illinois University Edwardsville
Speech Language Pathologist completing her clinical fellowship year in Illinois
Students with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) make up a significant portion of the students receiving intervention in schools. Bloom and Cohen report that 4.5 million children in the United States between the ages of 3 and 17 had ADHD in 2006 (Bloom & Cohen, 2007). This disorder can have a significant impact on students’ academic success due to difficulty with selective attention, sustained attention, impulsivity, and high levels of activity. One specific characteristic which inhibits academic success is reduced ability to selectively attend in order to listen to and follow directions (Maag & Anderson, 2007; Zentall, 2005). Learning strategies are a frequently used intervention for students with ADHD (Zentall, 2005). Furthermore, learning strategies to improve listening effectiveness are supported for this population (Alberta Education, 2006).
This article focuses on teaching a learning strategy to develop improved listening in students with ADHD. The goals of this article are to briefly define learning strategies, discuss necessary aspects of listening, introduce the FOCUS strategy, explain how to teach FOCUS, and explain how to evaluate students’ use of FOCUS in class.
What is a Learning Strategy?
Learning strategies are actions taken by the student to make learning easier, faster, more self-directed, more effective, and transferrable to new situations (Oxford, 1990). Developed to help students succeed in a variety of academic areas, learning strategies often employ the use of a first-letter mnemonic used to cue students to follow strategy steps. Depending on the strategy, these steps guide students as they work on academic tasks, such as reading comprehension, paragraph writing, or test taking. Learning strategies do not teach students content. They do, however, teach students how to approach the content. Instead of teaching students multiplication facts, a learning strategy might teach students the steps necessary to solve a multiplication problem (Scott & Compton, 2007). Proven to be one of the most effective instructional techniques for students with learning problems, strategy instruction is often crucial for students’ success (Beckman, 2002; Reid & Lienemann, 2006).
What are the Elements of Listening?
The first step in developing a learning strategy for improved listening is to identify the necessary elements in listening. First, listeners display several behaviors to let their communication partners know that they are prepared to focus their attention on the message; they will be quiet, watch the speaker, look at the materials presented by the speaker, and avoid fidgeting (Owca, Pawlak, & Pronobis, 2003). Secondly, individuals must be active listeners. Being an active listener rather than a passive listener means an individual actively thinks about the information being shared rather than just passively hearing it. Some ways in which individuals can actively think about the information include identifying the important parts, reminding themselves to focus on the message, summarizing the message, making connections to what they already know, and visualizing the message. In addition to being active listeners, individuals should be participants in the communication. Listeners can make comments, ask questions, and respond to questions (Brent & Anderson, 1993; Owca et al., 2003). These skills were used to develop the learning strategy below to improve the listening of students with ADHD.
Developing a Learning Strategy for Listening
Good learners are strategic, meaning that they possess a variety of ways to meet cognitive challenges. Good listeners use strategies that improve their performance when they are asked to listen. From the observations and literature described above, a learning strategy was developed to cue students into critical actions that they can take to attend to and process verbal information, commit it to memory, and communicate to the speaker that they are interested. Each step of the strategy corresponds with a specific task students should complete while engaged in improved listening. FOCUS is the mnemonic developed to outline this learning strategy. Each key word is an action verb that cues students on what to do (Figure 1).
Figure 1. FOCUS cue card
Focus on speaker
F1. Eyes and mind on the speaker.
F2. Resist talking to your neighbors.
F3. Keep your hands and feet quiet.
Open your mind
O1. Clear your mind of distracting thoughts. (Ignore distractions)
O2. Be ready to learn and remember.
O3. Set your mind on the subject.
O4. “Your brain is like a parachute. It only works when it’s open.”
O5. Think about what is being said.
C1. Try to relate what you are hearing to things that you already know and are related to the lesson.
C2. Create a picture in your mind of the new information.
C3. Listen to other students’ related comments.
Use your eyes
U1. Pay attention to the book, chalk board, worksheets, overheads, or other visual materials.
S1. Select the important parts so you know what to remember.
S2. Say the important parts to yourself in your own words.
S3. Ask questions to make sure you understand.
There is considerable literature that outlines the most effective method to teach learning strategies (Pressley & Woloshyn, 1995). Most experts agree that the strategy should be described to the student. This should include information about each step of the strategy and the benefits of using the strategy. If a mnemonic is used, the mnemonic should be rehearsed until the student can recite it easily from memory. The teacher should model strategy use and provide opportunities for both guided and independent practice. The student should be taught to apply the strategy in a variety of settings. Finally, the student and teacher should evaluate and monitor strategy use (Pressley & Woloshyn, 1995).
To begin this process, the teacher should first use Figures 2 and 3 to collect pre-intervention or baseline information about the students’ listening skills. The teacher might begin by teaching a short lesson on a topic related to the curriculum. See Figure 4 for a sample mini lesson. During the lesson, a fellow teacher or teacher’s aid might observe the students and note their listening behaviors using the FOCUS observation chart (Figure 2). After the lesson the teacher should check comprehension by asking the students questions related to the lesson. Any students who exhibit difficulty with the listening behaviors or in answering questions may significantly benefit from the FOCUS instruction.
Figure 4. Sample mini lesson
Penguins are like people because they are warm blooded. But unlike people, penguins have insulation that lets them live in extremely cold temperatures. Insulation is something that keeps things warm. Houses have insulation to keep them warm in the winter. The penguins’ insulation is several layers thick. A layer of tightly packed feathers covers the penguins’ bodies. (Show picture of penguin feathers from Internet.) Under the feather is a thick layer of fat called blubber. Both the feathers and the blubber are insulation for the penguin. Whales and dolphins also have blubber to keep them warm, or insulated from the cold. A penguin’s insulation works so well that sometimes they get too hot. What can you do when you get hot? How do you think a penguin will cool down when it gets hot? When this happens, the penguin fluffs up their feathers to let some of the heat out.
1. What is this lesson about?
2. How are penguins like people?
3. What is insulation?
4. What is the penguins’ thick layer of fat called?
5. What can a penguin do if it gets too hot?
After baseline data has been collected, teachers should introduce the strategy to students, teaching about the importance of the strategy and what each step of FOCUS implies. Following the introduction, activities in which students verbally rehearse the FOCUS steps can be used to help them master automatic recall of the mnemonic (Beckman, 2002). The FOCUS Cue Card (Figure 1) can be used as a visual cue at the beginning of verbal rehearsal and then removed as students improve in their ability to recall the steps. Once students are able to recite the FOCUS steps with 80% accuracy, without the cue card, the teacher can begin teaching students how to use the strategy steps in listening activities.
Activities to Teach Use of FOCUS Steps
Teachers can use the following activities when teaching the steps to the FOCUS strategy. Remember that each step should be described, modeled, practiced, and evaluated.
Figure 5. Activities to teach FOCUS
F: Focus on the Speaker
When teaching students to focus on the speaker, it is important to convey the reciprocity in communication. Students can be good listeners and not look at the speaker. However, that does not communicate to the speaker that the listener is interested. This simple communication of listening may have a dramatic effect on the quality of interaction. Anyone who has tried to talk to a disinterested person can attest to this. Therefore, it is crucial for the student to demonstrate behaviors consistent with good listening.
“Video Feedback”: Set up a video camera in the back of the classroom while teaching. Plan for a small distraction to occur as a story is read, such as setting a timer to tick. After the lesson, show the students the video and discuss how they did or did not remain focused on the speaker. Have the students discuss what the word focus means and describe the behaviors they exhibit when they are focused on something.
O: Open Your Mind
Multi-tasking is a skill growing in importance and popularity. It requires individuals to think about several topics at once. Unfortunately, this positive skill can negatively impact a student’s ability to listen effectively. For this reason, it is especially important to remind students that they must clear their heads and concentrate on what is being said in order to gain information from listening.
“What’s in Your Mind?”: Begin by asking the students to take out a piece of paper and write down or draw an image that displays what they are thinking about. Next, lead a discussion about things that might interfere with listening. The term “distracted” could be introduced here. The student may be distracted by thoughts of lunch, friendships, after school activities, or the previous academic topic, and all of these can cause students to “run out of space” in their head, much like you can run out of space on your computer storage device. Explain the importance of opening your mind to the current topic.
Making connections to the student’s prior knowledge (including interests and experiences) is a fundamental part of scaffolding as well as the basic process of learning. This part of the process helps the student to identify what he or she already knows about the topic, compare it to what is being presented, and then modify his or her concept of the topic to match. Making connections provides “hooks” on which to hang the new information, making the new information meaningful to the student and providing motivation to learn. Recognizing the importance of making connections and being able to do so are key steps in learning to use FOCUS.
“Who’s the Artist?”: Separate students into pairs, and give each pair the name of an unfamiliar animal (i.e. kangaroo rat, aye-aye, naked neck chicken, pygmy marmoset, Andean condor, scorpion fish, sloth, anglerfish; See Your World, 2009). Student A will describe to Student B what he or she thinks the animal looks like. Student B will draw exactly what Student A describes. Then the partners will trade roles. After each student has had a turn to draw, ask them if it was easy or difficult to follow their partners’ directions. Lead this discussion to the idea that they used their prior knowledge to draw what they thought the animal may look like. Students must take what they know about the topic and combine it with or replace it by the new information (i.e., from their partners).
U: Use Your Eyes
Using your eyes is likely a straightforward step to most teachers and clinicians reading this article. However, students may not recognize this as a valuable skill that can improve their ability to listen. Therefore, it is necessary that their attention is brought to the importance of looking at the visual aids that are available. Visual aids can be a variety of items: a page in the book, writing on the board, a poster, a worksheet, etc. Teaching students to recognize and use visual aids is important for this step of FOCUS.
“Math Magic” (Hopkins, 2002): This is a quick lesson to demonstrate the importance of using your eyes when you listen. Ask all the students to get into pairs and take out a pencil, paper, and calculator (optional). Explain that they will learn a trick for calculating people’s ages (students must be at least ten years old for the math trick to work). Read the following steps to the class:
Once the steps have been read, have the students try to complete the trick from memory. This would be difficult for any student to do without seeing the steps written out or being given one step at a time. After a minute or so, put up a Power Point slide or overhead of the steps listed in Figure 6. After students finish the calculations, ask them what they thought about the math trick and what might have made it easier. Discuss the importance of using visual aids that are available.
Selecting means that the student is eliminating extraneous information to focus on what is important in the message. As stated above, students with ADHD have noted deficits in selective attention, which negatively affects their ability to listen to and follow directions. Instead of trying to remember each and every word spoken by the speaker, the listener must learn how to identify and remember the important parts of the message. Trying to remember information that is unimportant can interfere with the student’s recall of the overall message.
“Newspaper Ads” (Jalongo, 1991): Place the students in pairs. One student will be the product salesman, and the other will be the newspaper writer. The salesman describes the product he wants to sell, including all the pertinent information about the product. The writer will listen to the salesman and then restate in his own words what the salesman told him. The pair will split up, with the writer writing out an ad for the product. The two will trade roles. The ads will be returned to the salespeople for them to review, and the salespeople will judge whether or not they approve printing of the ad. Discuss the fact that not all the information was included in the ads. Ask students how they decided what was important enough to be included in the ad information. Explain that identifying the important parts of a message helps them remember and focus on it.
Students are now at the point where mini lessons can be given in a variety of content areas as opportunities for them to practice applying FOCUS. See Figure 4 for a sample mini lesson. At first, lessons should be taken from content materials one grade level lower than where students are currently performing. This is done so that the focus of the challenge is on the use of the strategy, not necessarily on the content of the lesson. As students achieve mastery of FOCUS with the lower grade level content materials, mini lessons at the students’ current grade level can be given to assist students in learning to apply the FOCUS strategy to material that is more challenging.
Each mini lesson for FOCUS practice should follow a set of steps. First, the teacher should review FOCUS with the students using the FOCUS Cue Card. Next, students should be told that they will be practicing using FOCUS during a lesson and that they will be asked questions afterward to see how well they listened. The FOCUS Cue Card can be displayed in the room as a visual reminder of the strategy. An advanced organizer can be given to each student as an additional visual cue for use during the mini lesson. The teacher will present the brief mini lesson while using the Observation Chart (Figure 2) to record the behaviors that are representative of good listeners and take notes for individual feedback after the lesson. Once the mini lesson has been taught, the teacher will ask the students comprehension questions for information obtained through the lesson. Each student’s accuracy on these questions will be recorded on his or her Progress Chart (Figure 3) in the “Controlled Practice” section. Once the mini lessons are taught at students’ current grade levels, the data is recorded in the “Advanced Practice” section. These two forms of evaluation are explained in greater detail in the following section. Finally, the teacher and students will discuss how they applied the strategy during the lesson: how the steps were helpful, what they noticed as they used the steps, what they did well, and where they can improve.
As more mini lessons are taught, teachers should need to provide fewer and fewer cues for students to use the strategy. Also, less explanation of the strategy and less assistance with application will be needed as students progress in their ability to effectively apply FOCUS.
As stated earlier, students’ behaviors that demonstrate listening and their responses to listening comprehension questions should be evaluated before FOCUS is introduced. Having this baseline data will allow the teacher to show that students have experienced improvement in listening skills after learning to apply the FOCUS strategy.
Once students have practiced using the FOCUS strategy in the mini lesson format described above, their performance can be evaluated and recorded in the “Post-Test” section of the Progress Chart for comparison to the baseline data. Mini lessons like those above are used for the post-test evaluation sessions. Evaluation is completed through two methods. First, the students are observed and rated on behaviors related to the FOCUS strategy. During the lesson, each student is evaluated for: (a) eye contact with the speaker, (b) demonstration of listening by not talking to others, (c) use of correct sitting posture, (d) listening to other students’ comments, (e) use of relevant comments or questions, and (f) ability to follow directions (such as look at the board, take out your pencil, or turn to your neighbor). These behaviors can be easily rated during the lesson using the FOCUS Observation Chart (Figure 2)
Figure 2. FOCUS observation chart.
Secondly, comprehension questions related to the mini lesson are developed for assessment after the lesson. These questions can be given orally or in written form depending on the skills of the students. Each student’s score on the comprehension questions can be tracked to document progress using the FOCUS Progress Chart (Figure 3).
Figure 3. FOCUS progress chart
These two methods of evaluation should be employed for each mini lesson in pre-test, controlled practice, advanced practice, post-test, and maintenance to obtain data. The students should be able to gain 80% accuracy or above on the comprehension questions following the mini lessons and on the FOCUS behavior evaluation to demonstrate mastery at each level.
Students with ADHD face numerous challenges, with listening effectively being one. Listening is used in every class and in every situation throughout each school day. Students can apply the steps of the FOCUS strategy as they sit in class, go through the lunch line, complete group work, and interact with peers on the playground. Teaching students FOCUS and providing them with a variety of opportunities in which to practice effective use of the strategy can give them a tool to improve their functioning across the curriculum.
Alberta Education. (2006). Focusing on Success: Teaching Students with Attention Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder, grades 1-12. Retrieved May 3, 2010 from http://education.alberta.ca/admin/special/resources/adhd.aspx
Beckman, P. (2002). Strategy instruction. ERIC digest (Digest number E638). Arlington, VA: ERIC Clearinghouse on Disabilities and Gifted Education, Council for Exceptional Children. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED474302).
Bloom, B. & Cohen R. (2007). Summary health statistics for U.S. children: National health interview survey, 2006. National Center for Health Statistics. Vital Health Statistics, 10(234), 5. Retreived May 3, 2010 from http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/series/sr_10/sr10_234.pdf
Brent, R. & Anderson, P. (1993). Developing children’s classroom listening strategies. The Reading Teacher, 47, 122-126. Retrieved from http://www.reading.org/general/Publications/Journals/RT.aspx
Hopkins, G. (2002). Math magic. Education world: The educator’s best friend. Retrieved June 19, 2009, from http://www.educationworld.com/a_lesson/02/lp265-03.shtml
Jalongo, M. (1991). Strategies for developing children's listening skills: Fastback 314. Bloomington, IN: Phi Delta Kappa Educational Foundation. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED331099).
Maag, J. & Anderson, J. (2007). Sound-field amplification to increase compliance to directions in students with ADHD. Behavioral Disorders, 32, 238-253.
Owca, S., Pawlak, E., & Pronobis, M. (2003). Improving student academic success through the promotion of listening skills. Master’s Action Research Project, Saint Xavier University and IRI/Skylight. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED478233).
Oxford, R. (1990). Language learning strategies: What every teacher should know. Boston: Heinle & Heinle.
Pressley, M. & Woloshyn, V. (1995). Cognitive strategy instruction that really improves children’s academic performance (2nd ed.). Cambridge, MA: Brookline Books.
Reid, R., & Lienemann, T.O. (2006). Strategy instruction for students with learning disabilities: What works for special needs learners? New York, NY: Gilford Publications.
Scott, V.G., & Compton, L. (2007). A new TRICK for the trade: A strategy for keeping an agenda book for secondary students. Intervention in School and Clinic, 42, 280-284.
See Your World, LLC. (2009). Nineteen insanely weird animals. Life: Your World in Pictures. Retrieved June 19, 2009, from http://www.life.com/image/first/in-gallery/26582/19-insanely-weird-animals
Zentall, S. (2005). Theory- and evidence-based strategies for children with attentional problems. Psychology in the Schools, 42, 821-836. doi: 10.1002/pits.20114
Center for Research on Learning:
Cognitive Learning Strategies:
Cognitive Strategies in Middle School:
Neurofeedback and Metacognitive Strategies:
Peer-Assisted Learning Strategies:
Rethinking ADHD from a Cognitive Perspective:
Suggested Classroom Interventions for Children with ADD & Learning Disabilities:
University of Nebraska-Lincoln/ Cognitive Strategy Instruction:
1. Curatolo P, D’Agati E, Moavero R. The neurobiological basis of ADHD. Ital J Pediatr. 2010;36(1):79.[PMC free article][PubMed]
2. Braaten EB, Rosén LA. Self-regulation of affect in attention deficit-hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) and non-ADHD boys: differences in empathic responding. J Consult Clinl Psych. 2000;68(2):313–321.[PubMed]
3. Daley D, Birchwood J. ADHD and academic performance: why does ADHD impact on academic performance and what can be done to support ADHD children in the classroom? Child Care Health Dev. 2009;36(4):455–464.[PubMed]
4. American Psychiatric Association . Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders, Fourth Edition, Text Revision. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association; 2000.
5. Polderman TJC, Boomsma DI, Bartels M, Verhulst FC, Huizink AC. A systematic review of prospective studies on attention problems and academic achievement. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2010;122:271–284.[PubMed]
6. Rowles BM, Findling RL. Review of pharmacotherapy options for the treatment of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) and ADHD-like symptoms in children and adolescents with developmental disorders. Dev Disabil Res Rev. 2010;16:273–282.[PubMed]
7. Lien MT, Carlson JS, Hunter-Oehmke S, Knapp KA. A pilot investigation of teachers’ perceptions of psychotropic drug use in schools. J Attention Disord. 2007;11(2):172–178.[PubMed]
8. Culpepper L. Primary care treatment of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. J Clin Psychiat. 2006;67(Suppl 8):51–58.[PubMed]
9. DeNisco S, Tiago C, Kravitz C. Evaluation and treatment of pediatric ADHD. Nurse Pract. 2005;30(8):14–23.[PubMed]
10. Sawyer MG, Whaites L, Rey JM, Hazell PL, Graetz BW, Baghurst P. Health related quality of life of children and adolescents with mental disorders. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2002;41(5):530–537.[PubMed]
11. Salmeron PA. Childhood and adolescent attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder: diagnosis, clinical practice guidelines and social implications. J Am Acad Nurse Pract. 2008;21:488–497.[PubMed]
12. Barkley RA. Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder: A Handbook for Diagnosis and Treatment. New York: Guildford Press; 1990.
13. Knutson KC, O’Malley M. Adult attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: a survey of diagnosis and treatment practices. J Am Acad Nurse Pract. 2009;22:593–601.[PubMed]
14. Murray DW. Treatment of preschoolers with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Curr Psychiatry Rep. 2010;12:374–381.[PubMed]
15. Faraone SV, Biederman J, Spencer TJ, Aleardi M. Comparing the efficacy of medications for ADHD using meta-analysis. Med Gen Med. 2006;8(4):4.[PMC free article][PubMed]
16. Wigal SB, Chae S, Patel A, Steinberg-Epstein R. Advances in the treatment of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: a guide for pediatric neurologists. Semin Pediatr Neurol. 2010;17:230–236.[PubMed]
17. Jadad AR, Booker L, Gauld M, et al. The treatment of attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder: An annotated bibliography and critical appraisal of published systematic reviews and metaanalyses. Can J Psychiat. 1999;44(10):1025–1035.[PubMed]
18. Kaplan G, Newcorn JH. Pharmacotherapy for child and adolescent attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder. Pediatr Clin North Am. 2011;58:99–120.[PubMed]
19. Singer-Leshinsky S. Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: helping families to achieve success. JAAPA. 2011;24(3):52–57.[PubMed]
20. Bussing R, Gary FA. Practice guidelines and parental ADHD treatment evaluations: friends or foes? Harvard Rev Psychiat. 2001;9:223–233.[PubMed]
21. Daley D. Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder: a review of the essential facts. Child Care Health Dev. 2006;32(2):193–204.[PubMed]
22. Olaniyan O, dosReis S, Garriett V, et al. Community perspectives of childhood behavioral problems and ADHD among African American parents. Ambul Pediatr. 2007;7(3):226–231.[PubMed]
23. Peters K, Jackson D. Mothers’ experiences of parenting a child with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. J Adv Nurs. 2009;65(1):62–71.[PubMed]
24. Ahmed R, McCaffery KJ, Aslani P. Factors influencing parental decision-making about stimulant treatment for attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. J Child Adolesc Psychopharmacol. 2013;23(3):163–178.[PubMed]
25. McGuinness TM. Helping parents decide on ADHD treatment for their children. J Psychosoc Nurs Ment Health Serv. 2008;46(8):23–27.[PubMed]
26. Sloper P. Service needs of families of children with severe physical disability. Child Care Health Dev. 1992;18:259–282.[PubMed]
27. Starke M, Möller A. Parents’ needs for knowledge concerning the medical diagnosis of their children. J Child Health Care. 2002;6(4):245–257.[PubMed]
28. Davies S, Hall D. “Contact a family”: professionals and parents in partnership. Arch Dis Child. 2005;90:1053–1057.[PMC free article][PubMed]
29. Hummelinck A, Pollock K. Parents’ information needs about the treatment of their chronically ill child: a qualitative study. Patient Educ Couns. 2006;62(2):228–234.[PubMed]
30. Sciberras E, Iyer S, Efron D, Green J. Information needs of parents of children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Clin Pediatr. 2010;49(2):150–157.[PubMed]
31. Morton RL, Tong A, Howard K, Snelling P, Webster AC. The views of patients and carers in treatment decision making for chronic kidney disease: systematic review and thematic synthesis of qualitative studies. BMJ. 2010;340:c112.[PMC free article][PubMed]
32. Ahmed R, Borst J, Wei YC, Aslani P. Parents’ perspectives about factors influencing adherence to pharmacotherapy for ADHD J Atten DisordEpub August302013 [PubMed]
33. Cameron J. Focusing on the focus group. In: Hay I, editor. Qualitative Research Methods in Human Geography. Melbourne: Oxford University Press; 2005. pp. 156–182.
34. McLeod JD, Fettes DL, Jensen PS, Pescosolido BA, Martin JK. Public knowledge, beliefs, and treatment preferences concerning attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder. Psych Serv. 2007;58(5):626–631.[PMC free article][PubMed]
35. Summers JA, Caplan PJ. Laypeople’s attitudes toward drug treatment for behavioural control depend on which disorder and which drug. Clin Pediatr. 1987;26:258–263.[PubMed]
36. Fisher HR. The needs of parents with chronically sick children: a literature review. J Adv Nurs. 2001;36(4):600–607.[PubMed]
37. Coulter A, Entwistle V, Gilbert D. Sharing decisions with patients: is the information good enough? BMJ. 1999;318:318–322.[PMC free article][PubMed]
38. McConkey R. Information needs of parents about learning disabilities. J Learn Disabil. 2003;7:211–219.
39. Pain H. Coping with a child with disabilities from the parents’ perspective: the function of information. Child Care Health Dev. 1999;25(4):299–312.[PubMed]
40. Caminiti C, Diodati F, Filiberti S, et al. Cross-cultural adaptation and patients’ judgments of a question prompt list for Italian-speaking cancer patients. BMC Health Serv Res. 2010;10:16.[PMC free article][PubMed]
41. Dimoska A, Tattersall MHN, Butow PN, Shepherd H, Kinnersley P. Can a “prompt list” empower cancer patients to ask relevant questions? Cancer. 2008;113(2):225–237.[PubMed]
42. Clayton J, Butow P, Tattersall M, et al. Asking questions can help: development and preliminary evaluation of a question prompt list for palliative care patients. Br J Cancer. 2003;89:2069–2077.[PMC free article][PubMed]
43. Clayton JM, Butow PN, Tattersall MHN, et al. Randomized controlled trial of a prompt list to help advanced cancer patients and their caregivers to ask questions about prognosis and end of life care. J Clin Oncol. 2007;25(6):715–723.[PubMed]
44. Spiegle G, Al-Sukhni E, Schmocker S, et al. Patient decision aids for cancer treatment: are there any alternatives? Cancer. 2013;119(1):189–200.[PubMed]
45. Bennet DS, Power TJ, Rostain AL, Carr DE. Parent acceptability and feasibility of ADHD interventions: assessment, correlates and predictive validity. J Pediatr Psychol. 1996;21(5):643–657.[PubMed]
46. Powell RA, Single HM. Focus groups. Int J Qual Health Care. 1996;8(5):499–504.[PubMed]
47. Giacomini MK, Cook DJ. Users’ guides to the medical literature: XXIII. Qualitative research in healthcare A: are the results of the study valid? Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group. J Am Med Assoc. 2000;248:357–362.[PubMed]
48. Ahmed R, Aslani P. Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: an update on medication adherence and persistence in children, adolescents and adults. Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2013;13(6):791–815.[PubMed]