Essay On Ecologically Sensitive Area Of Western G Hats And Eastern G Hats

The Western Ghats Ecology Expert Panel reporting to the Ministry of Environment and Forests (MoEF) has made several salutary recommendations for the long-term conservation of this global biodiversity hotspot. Renowned for their flora and fauna, along with the Eastern Himalayas, these mountains and valleys hugging the Arabian Sea coast for a length of 1,500 km need an overarching protection regime that cares as much for the tribal people they have sheltered as for their biological diversity. The experts studied scientific reports and Supreme Court judgments, consulted the State governments involved, and listened to village panchayats. A central message that emerges is that the entire ghat region meets the criteria for declaration as an ecologically sensitive area. Within this broad framework, the report makes the point that there are Ecologically Sensitive Zones of three levels of significance, which can be demarcated at the taluk or block level. The MoEF, which is empowered under the Environment (Protection) Act, 1986 to declare any region as deserving of special protection, should consider this seriously. Such protection is essential to rule out incompatible activities such as mining, constructing large dams, and setting up polluting industries.

If there is one single reason to protect the whole of the Western Ghats, it is the phenomenon of endemism. According to reliable estimates, they have more than 1,500 endemic species of flowering plants, and at least 500 such species of fishes, amphibians, reptiles, birds, and mammals. New species continue to be reported. It is striking that the ghats represent an extraordinary sliver of diverse life in a populous country and have in fact survived with community support. The MoEF would therefore do well to heed the advice of the expert group and unhesitatingly reject environmental clearance for two controversial dam projects — Athirapilly in Kerala and Gundia in Karnataka. The locations of both come under the most sensitive ecological zone category. In this context, it is relevant that a decade ago the Kerala High Court directed the State Electricity Board to repair and restore all existing dams to maximise power output. Doing so can eliminate the need for a destructive new structure at Athirapilly. A second issue relates to mining in Goa. Here the panel has rightly called for an indefinite moratorium on clearances for new mines in sensitive zones and phasing out of the activity in fragile areas by 2016. The guidelines proposed are sound overall. Translating them into action through a statutory apex body such as a Western Ghats Ecological Authority holds the key.

1. Cleghorn H. The forests and gardens of south India London: W.H. Allen & Company; 1861.

2. Puri GS, Meher-Homij VM, Gupta RK, Puri S. Forest ecology. Oxford: IBH Publishing Company; 1960.

3. Adolphus WHW. Consolidated working plan for the Salem forest division. Government Press; Madras Presidency, Madras: 1932.

4. Thankam K. Working plan for the Chengalpattu forest division Government of Tamil Nadu. Government Press, Madras: 1959.

5. Harikrishnan I. Working plan for the Salem forest division Government of Tamil Nadu. Government Press, Madras: 1967.

6. Bhat DM, Murali KS, Ravindranath NH. Formation and recovery of secondary forests in India: a particular reference to Western Ghats in South India. J Trop For Sci. 2001; 13: 601–620.

7. Prasad R. Sustainable forest management for dry forests of South Asia In: Cheng TL, Durst PB, editors. Development of national-level criteria and indicators for the sustainable management of dry forests of Asia: background papers. Thailand: RAP Publishers/FAO; 2000. p. 27–74.

8. Ramachandran A, Jayakumar S, Haroon ARM, Bashkaran A. Carbon management in forest floor–An agenda of 21st century in Indian forestry scenario. Indian For. 2007; 133: 25–40.

9. Stebbing EP. The forests of India, vol I London: John Lane/The Bodley Head Limited; 1922.

10. Jayakumar S, Ramachandran A, Baskaran G, Heo J. Forest dynamics in the Eastern Ghats of Tamil Nadu, India. Environ Manage. 2009; 43: 326–345. doi: 10.1007/s00267-008-9219-y[PubMed]

11. Jayakumar S, Ramachandran A, Bhaskaran G, Heo J, Kim WS. Site suitability assessment for Joint Forest Management (JFM): a geospatial approach. Korean J Remote Sens. 2007; 23: 473–481.

12. Ministry of Environment and Forests. Forest survey of India: State of forest report. Dehradun: Government of India; 2003.

13. Ramachandran A, Jayakumar S, Arockiasamy DI. Need for reclassification of forest types in India using high-resolution satellite data and field study for better management. Indian For. 2005; 131: 3–12.

14. Sagar R, Singh JS. Local plant species depletion in a tropical dry deciduous forest of northern India. Environ Conserv. 2004; 31: 55–62.

15. Turner W, Spector S, Gardiner N, Fladeland M, Sterling E, Steininger M. Remote sensing for biodiversity science and conservation. Trends Ecol Evol. 2003; 18: 306–314.

16. Chambers JQ, Asner GP, Morton DC, Anderson LO, Saatchi SS, Espírito-Santo FD, et al. Regional ecosystem structure and function: ecological insights from remote sensing of tropical forests. Trends Ecol Evol. 2007; 22: 414–423. [PubMed]

17. Puyravaud JP, Davidar P, Laurance WF. Cryptic loss of India’s native forests. Science. 2010; 329: 32. [PubMed]

18. Menon S, Bawa KS. Deforestation in the tropics: reconciling disparities in estimates for India. Ambio. 1998; 27: 576–577.

19. Aziz SA, Laurance WF, Clements R. Forests reserved for rubber?Frontiers Ecol Environ. 2010; 8: 178.

20. Moffat AJ. Indicators of soil quality for UK forestry. Forestry. 2003; 76: 1–22.

21. Satyam V, Jayakumar S. Impact of forest fire on physical, chemical and biological properties of soil: A review. Proc Int Acad Ecol Environ Sci. 2012; 2: 168–176.

22. Acton DF, Padbury GA. A conceptual framework for soil quality assessment and monitoring In: Acton DF, editor. A program to assess and monitor soil quality in Canada: soil quality evaluation program summary (interim). Ottawa, Canada: Centre for Land and Biological Resources Research, No. 93–49, Agriculture Canada; 1993.

23. Bastida F, Zsolnay A, Hernández T, García C. Past, present and future of soil quality indices: a biological perspective. Geoderma. 2008; 147: 159–171.

24. Tesfahunegn GB. Soil quality assessment strategies for evaluating soil degradation in northern Ethiopia. Appl Environ Soil Sci. 2014; 2014, Article ID 646502, 14 pages.

25. Schoenholtz SH, Van Miegroet H, Burger JA. A review of chemical and physical properties as indicators of forest soil quality: challenges and opportunities. Forest Ecology and Management. 2000; 138: 335–356.

26. USDA NRCS. United States Department of Agriculture Natural Resources Conservation Service. Soil Quality Enhancement Activity–SQL07—Forest stand improvement for soil quality. 2010.

27. Blecker SW, Stillings LL, Amacher MC, Ippolito JA, DeCrappeo NM. Development of vegetation based soil quality indices for mineralized terrane in arid and semi-arid regions, Ecol Indic. 2012; 20: 65–74.

28. Doran JW, Parkin TB. Quantitative indicators of soil quality: a minimum data set In: Doran JW, Jones AJ, editors. Methods for assessing soil quality. Madison: Soil Science Society of America, Inc.; 1996.

29. Lilburne L, Sparling G, Hewitt A, Campbell S, Stephens P. Sindi v3: improvements to a web- based tool for assessing soil quality In: Stephens P, Callaghan J, Austin A, editors. Proceedings of Soil Quality and Sustainable Land Management Workshop; 2002 Apr 3–5; Palmerston North, New Zealand. Palmerson North: Landcare Research; 2002. p. 47–49.

30. Council of Europe. Soil Protection. Recommendation to the Council of Ministers. Strasbourg: The Council; 1992.

31. Royal Commission on Environmental Pollution. Nineteenth report–Sustainable Use of Soil. London: HMSO; 1996.

32. Bhardwaj AK, Jasrotia P, Hamilton SK, Robertson GP. Ecological management of intensively cropped agro-ecosystems improves soil quality with sustained productivity. Agric Ecosyst Environ. 2011; 3: 419–429.

33. Masto RE, Chhonkar PK, Singh D, Patra AK. Soil quality response to long-term nutrient and crop management on a semi-arid inceptisol. Agric Ecosyst Environ. 2007; 118: 30–142.

34. Ramachandran A, Natarajan N, Nagamurugan N, Balaguru B, Soosairaj S, Britto SJ. Assessment of tree species diversity in semi-evergreen forests of Chitteri hills, Eastern Ghats of Tamil Nadu, South India. Indian Journal of Forestry. 2008; 31: 175–180.

35. Balaguru B, Britto SJ, Nagamurugan N, Natarajan D, Soosairaj S. Identifying conservation priority zones for effective management of tropical forests in Eastern Ghats of India Volume 2. Forest Diversity and management. 2006; 469–483.

36. Blake GR, Hartge KH. Bulk Density In: Klute A, editor. Methods of soil analysis. Agronomy monograph 9, Part I. Madison, WI: America Society of Agronomy; 1986. pp. 363–375.

37. Tandon HLS. Methods of analysis of soils plants water and fertilizers New Delhi: Fertilizer Development and Consultation Organisation; 1995.

38. Wang D, Anderson DW. Direct measurement of organic carbon content in soils by the Leco CR- 12 carbon analyzer. Commun Soil Sci Plant Anal. 1998; 29: 15–21.

39. Toth SJ, Prince AL. Estimation of cation exchange capacity and exchangeable calcium, potassium, and sodium contents of soils by flame photometer techniques. Soil Sci. 1949; 67: 439–445.

40. Anderson JM, Inagram JSI. Tropical Soil Biology and Fertility, A handbook of Methods Wallingford, UK: CAB International; 1993.

41. Pratt PF. Potassium In: Page AL, editor. Methods of soil analysis. Part 2. Chemical and microbiological properties. Madison: Soil Science Society of America, Inc.; 1956: 1022–1030.

42. Jackson ML. Soil chemical analysis. New Delhi: Prentice Hall Inc.; 1973.

43. Lindsay WL, Norvell WA. Development of a DTPA soil test for zinc, iron, manganese and copper. Soil Sci Soc Am J. 1978; 42: 421–428.

44. Subbiah B, Asija GL. A rapid procedure for estimation of available nitrogen in soils. Curr Sci. 1956; 25: 8.

45. Olsen SR, Cole CV, Watanabe FS, Dean LA. Estimation of available phosphorus soil by extraction with sodium bicarbonate Washington: USDA; 1954. 18 p.

46. Stanford S, English L. Use of flame photometer in rapid soil tests of K and Ca. Agron J. 1949; 41: 446–447.

47. Vance ED, Brookes PC, Jenkinson DS. An extraction method for measuring soil microbial biomass. Soil Biol Biochem. 1987; 19: 703–707.

48. Owen JS, Wang MK, Wang CH, King HB, Sun HL. Net N mineralization and nitrification rates in a forested ecosystem in north-eastern Taiwan. For Ecol Manage. 2003; 176: 519–530.

49. Andrews SS, Flora CB, Mitchell JP, Karlen DL. Growers’ perception and acceptance of soil quality indices. Geoderma. 2003;114: 187–213.

50. IBM Carp. IBM SPSS statistics for windows, version 22.0 Armonk, NY: IBM Corp; 2013.

51. Andrews SS, Karlen DL, Mitchel JP. A comparison of soil quality indexing methods for vegetable production systems in Northern California. Agric Ecosyst Environ. 2002; 90: 25–45.

52. Andrews SS, Carroll CR. Designing a soil quality assessment tool for sustainable agroecosystem management. Ecol Appl. 2001; 11: 1573–1585.

53. Brejda JJ, Moorman TB, Karlen DL, Dao TH. Identification of regional soil quality factors and indicators. I. Central and Southern High Plains. Soil Sci Soc Am J. 2000; 64: 2115–2124.

54. Tan SY, Li J. An exploratory spatial analysis of soil organic carbon distribution in Canadian Eco-regions. The International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote sensing and spatial information sciences, Volume XL-2, 2014. ISPRS Technical Commission II Symposium, 6–8 October 2014, Toronto, Canada.

55. Wang S, Zhou C, Liu J, Tian H, Li K, Yang X. Carbon storage in northeast China as estimated from vegetation and soil inventories. Environ Pollut. 2002; 116: S157–S165. [PubMed]

56. Ramachandran A, Jayakumar S, Haroon RM, Bhaskaran A, Arockiasamy DI. Carbon sequestration: estimation of carbon stock in natural forests using geospatial technology in the Eastern Ghats of Tamil Nadu, India. Curr Sci. 2007; 92: 323–331.

57. Erdas 2011. Erdas Imagine, Hexgon geospatial, ink GA, USA.

58. Liebig MA, Varvel G, Doran J. A simple performance based index for assessing multiple agroecosystem functions. Agron J. 2001; 93: 313–318.

59. Leiros MC, Trasar-Cepeda C, Seoane S, Gil-Sotres F. Biochemical properties of acid soils under climax vegetation (Atlantic oakwood) in an area of the European temperate-humid zone (Galicia, NW Spain): general parameters. Soil Biol Biochem. 2000; 32: 733–745.

60. Chen CR, Xu ZH, Blumfield TJ, Hughes JM. Soil microbial biomass during the early establishment of hoop pine plantation: seasonal variation and impacts of site preparation. Forest Ecol Manage. 2003; 186: 213–225.

61. Gil-Sotres F, Trasar-Cepeda C, Leiros MC, Seoane S. Different approaches to evaluating soil quality using biochemical properties. Soil Biol Biochem. 2005; 37: 877–887.

62. Miralles I, Ortega R, Sanchez-Maranon M, Leiros MC, Trasar-Cepeda C, Gil-Sotres F. Biochemical properties of range and forest soils in Mediterranean mountain environments. Biol Fertil Soils. 2007; 43: 721–729.

63. Ndiaya EL, Sandeno JM, McGrath D, Dick RP. Integrative biological indicators for detecting change in soil quality AmeriJ Alternat Agricult. 2000; 15: 26–36.

64. Ramaswami G, Sukumar R. Long-term environmental correlates of invasion by Lantana camara (Verbenaceae) in a seasonally dry tropical forest. PLoS One. 2013; 8: e76995 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0076995[PMC free article][PubMed]

65. Raizada P, Sharma GP, Raghubanshi AS. Ingress of Lantana in dry tropical forest fragments: edge and shade effects. Curr Sci. 2006; 94:180–182.

66. Joshi AA, Mudappa D, Shankar Raman TR. Invasive alien species in relation to edges and forest structure in tropical rainforest fragments of the Western Ghats. Trop Ecol. 2015; 56: 233–244.

67. Ramaswami G, Sukumar R. Lantana camara L. (Verbenaceae) invasion along streams in a heterogeneous landscape. J Biosci. 2014; 39: 717–726. [PubMed]

68. Goyal N, Pardha-Saradhi P, Sharma GP. Can adaptive modulation of traits to urban environments facilitate Ricinus communis L. invasiveness?Environ Monit Assess. 2014; 186: 7941–7948. doi: 10.1007/s10661-014-3978-0[PubMed]

69. Puyravaud JP, Davidar P, Laurance WF. Cryptic destruction of India's native forests. Conserv Lett. 2010; 3: 90–394.

0 Replies to “Essay On Ecologically Sensitive Area Of Western G Hats And Eastern G Hats”

Lascia un Commento

L'indirizzo email non verrà pubblicato. I campi obbligatori sono contrassegnati *